@MattMackowiak: SIREN: Huntsman to speak at DNC Convention? http://t.co/0dUYDrwo (h/t @rickwilson) / don’t tell me I didn’t warn you — http://t.co/Th7s0smt
iancass August 10, 2012 at 04:14PM
@iancass: No comment or analysis from Jayson Blair, please | MT @TheAtlanticWire Fareed Zakaria apologizes for ‘serious lapse’ http://t.co/w1BayuvK
notjessewalker August 10, 2012 at 12:00PM
@notjessewalker: @GDebenedetti @jbarro @radleybalko We’ve been doomed for a while.
PublishersWkly August 10, 2012 at 06:21AM
@PublishersWkly: Humor writer David Rakoff has died of cancer, at age 47 http://t.co/GsxPlb2K
Romney May Have No Choice But To Pick Paul Ryan
![]()
Conservative anxiety has stalked Mitt Romney since the outset of his presidential campaign, expressing itself in a series of hopes that a nominee who was not Romney might win, and then, after his nomination became inevitable, as endless caterwauling for Romney himself to act less … Romney-like. Romney’s vice-presidential selection has begun to serve as a stand-in for these demands, and as recently as a week ago, they split between calls for him to pick Paul Ryan and calls for Marco Rubio.
But since then, Romney’s position has steadily eroded, intensifying the conservative panic. And a report by National Review’s Ryan Costa that Romney was giving Ryan strong consideration focused all the attention on the dreamy House Budget Committee chairman and unofficial party leader. Suddenly Ryan’s potential nomination has become the sole locus of the conservative movement’s longings.
The reason Ryan had earlier been deemed unlikely was that Romney intended to run a campaign focused entirely on the economy. His reasoning was sound enough. Romney’s status as the challenger during an economic crisis with mass unemployment was a gigantic asset, but it was (aside from his growing Superpac advantage) his only asset. America still hated the Republican Party, hated its Congressional wing, and bitterly opposed the fiscal priorities it championed. Romney understood that he needed to bring together nearly every voter dispirited with the status quo, and not only those also eager to join a crusade to smash the welfare state.
Conservatives had been itching to enlist Romney more openly in just such a crusade, out of the same overweening ideological confidence that drove them to enlist the Republican Congress. And Romney’s campaign plan has begun to look increasingly shaky. Obama has successfully defined him as a self-interested agent of his economic class. Polls have shown that Romney’s perceived advantage in handling the economy, his only advantage, has dwindled to little or nothing. (The latest Fox News poll has Romney’s advantage on the economy dropping from 7 points to 3; In CNN’s poll, just 29% agreed that the economy will improve only if Romney wins – this is his entire campaign premise! – while 31% said it would improve only if Obama wins.)
The oft-repeated conservative argument for Ryan is that Romney has already endorsed the Ryan plan closely enough to incur its liabilities, so he might as well pick the politician best equipped to defend it. There’s certainly something to this. Ryan gets too little credit for his political skills. He has won consistently in a moderate district. He has managed to build a reputation among the national press corps as a thoughtful, compromise-friendly moderate while hewing to the right wing of his party. The major argument of my profile of Ryan from last spring is that his public persona is a giant scam; but pulling off a scam like that is the mark of a skillful pol.
On the other hand, Ryan’s capacity for national-level wholesale politics has yet to be proven. He has masterfully played the Washington press corps, but it remains largely an inside game. Most Americans have not formed an opinion about him. He has a long record of radical votes and is the functional leader of a wildly unpopular Congressional wing. The one real electoral test of his plan’s political tolerability came in a special election in a Republican district in upstate New York in 2011, in which an underdog Democrat swept to victory by relentlessly pounding Ryan’s plan, and especially its provision to privatize Medicare.
At this point, joining Ryan to the ticket would be a huge gamble. Romney would be tapping into Ryan’s immense political talent, but giving up on his win-by-default strategy that has taken a beating but might look good again if, say, some international disaster craters the recovery between now and November. In any case, the conservative drumbeat for Ryan has grown so overwhelming that it’s no longer even clear that Romney could turn Ryan down for an Incredibly Boring White Guy, even if he wants to. The Republican Party belongs to Ryan.
Read more posts by Jonathan Chait
Filed Under:
the national interest
,politics
,campaign 2012
,paul ryan
,mitt romney
via Daily Intel http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/08/romney-may-have-no-choice-but-to-pick-paul-ryan.html
gettingsome August 10, 2012 at 08:12AM
@gettingsome: I hear rumors from China that the woman the Chinese have on trial for Neil Heywood’s murder is not really Gu Kailai. http://t.co/oxPjD9ow
RyanLizza August 10, 2012 at 08:03AM
@RyanLizza: Wow, @mikeallen got ahold of Obama’s convention planning docs. Pretty huge scoop. Warning: lots of spoilers! http://t.co/6ZaQhh7x
All the President’s Media
These days it’s the government, not media conglomerates, that has the true monopoly on information in Argentina.
via NYT > Most Recent Headlines http://latitude.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/09/argentinas-government-has-a-monopoly-on-information/
GOLDMAN, GE Employees Switch to Romney…
GOLDMAN, GE Employees Switch to Romney…
via DrudgeSiren.com – All Stories http://www.drudgesiren.com/allhl.php?id=146263&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+drudgesiren%2FoGpG+%28DrudgeSiren.com+-+All+Stories%29#h146263
AMC Networks Tops Q2 Earnings Forecasts But Warns Of Dish Network Damage
![]()
This may be the key line in AMC Networks’ report this morning: Dish Network’s decision to drop AMC, IFC, WEtv, and Sundance Channel has cut the programmer’s total subscribers by 13% — but if the dispute isn’t resolved then the impact on cash flow and operating income “will be materially higher.†(Yesterday Dish Chairman Charlie Ergen was still talking tough, saying that his customers aren’t interested in AMC’s channels.) Yet the Q2 numbers, from the period before the fight with Dish broke open, aren’t bad. AMC generated $41.5M in net income, +52.9% vs the same period last year, on revenues of $327.6M, +12.2%. The revenue figure exceeds forecasts of $324.5M. And earnings at 58 cents a share beat the Street’s expectations by a penny. The domestic networks carried the ball with revenues +14.4% to $305.2M and operating income +21.6% to $111.3M. Ad sales grew 13.4% to $130M, while payments from cable and satellite companies were +15.2% to $176M.
But AMC has problems at its “International and Other†operation which includes its overseas channels, IFC Films, a broadcasting and technology unit, and VOOM HD. Revenues here were -13.1% to $26.3M with operating losses increasing 53.8% to $14.1M. The release sheds little light here, simply saying that it reflects declining revenues at IFC Films and the tech unit — as well as higher litigation expenses related to AMC’s $2.5B breach of contract suit against Dish for dropping the VOOM channels. Dish’s decision to drop AMC’s services is “directly related†to the suit, which goes to trial on September 18 in New York State Supreme Court, AMC chief Josh Sapan says. “Last month, the company received 36 Emmy Award nominations, more than any other basic cable television group,†he adds. “This critical reception helps drive the growth of our business and our financial performance.â€
via Deadline.com http://www.deadline.com/2012/08/amc-networks-q2-earning/