No Drama Spending Bill Glides Through Rules

In the latest sign that a stop-gap spending measure could sail through Congress before the end of next week, the House Rules Committee on Wednesday devoted less than 10 minutes to the legislation that would fund the government for the next six months.

A room usually fraught with tense exchanges and snide one-liners (doled out during the committee’s many late-night meetings) saw the top Republican and Democrat of the House Appropriations Committee speak briefly about their bill before being lauded by three Rules Committee members for their efforts. No leading questions, no terse remarks, just some pats on the back before the committee moved on to other business.

The bill’s $1.047 trillion annual rate represents an increase of about $8 billion over current spending levels. Conservatives, though, support the bill – in fact, they pushed for leadership to take it up now rather than risking the possibility that it could become tangled up in larger discussions about taxes and other spending if the measure were to be left for the post-election lame-duck session.

Republicans want to avoid allowing Democrats to use the threat of a government shutdown as leverage against them in the debate over the Bush-era tax cuts and sequestration. So conservatives agreed to a spending increase, despite having passed a fiscal year 2013 budget that would cap spending at $1.028 trillion.

Congressional leadership announced a deal at the end of July on the bill, which contains no policy riders and cannot be amended on the floor. The Senate is expected to vote on it next Thursday.

via Homepage http://influencealley.nationaljournal.com/2012/09/no-drama-spending-bill-glides.php

Nasty smell explained

A peculiar rotten-egg smell covering the Los Angeles region has an explanation: it was brought in by winds blowing in from Salton Sea, a saline lake in Southern California, where a recent massive fish die-off occured. [Examiner]


via Boing Boing http://boingboing.net/2012/09/11/nasty-smell-explained.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+%28Boing+Boing%29

Moody’s: U.S. Rating Hinges on Budget

Moody’s said it could downgrade the U.S. government’s credit rating next year if steps aren’t taken to tackle the rising debt, in the latest reminder of the tense fiscal negotiations looming for Congress and the White House.

via WSJ.com: What's News US http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444017504577645310593048338.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us

Hilarious demand from 1924: A congressional probe into the subjunctive


* From Philip Corbett’s blog: Save the subjunctive! (nytimes.com)

via JIMROMENESKO.COM http://jimromenesko.com/2012/09/11/hilarious-demand-from-1924-a-congressional-probe-into-the-subjunctive/

U.S. Missile Defense Protections Are Flawed, Panel Says

Scientists and military experts working for the National Research Council are critical of the Obama administration’s strategy and suggest changes to the United States’ antimissile system.

via NYT > Most Recent Headlines http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/12/science/us-missile-defense-protections-are-called-vulnerable.html

An Exasperated Plea to Newspapers: More Exciting Headlines, Please!

Display copy in American broadsheets is oppressively boring — and reflective of a deeper attitude that contributes to their declining fortunes.

newspaper fullness.png

Flickr/NS Newsflash

On road trips, including the one I took recently between Tampa, Florida, and Charlotte, North Carolina, I habitually buy a local newspaper every time I stop to buy gas, food, or coffee. As my colleague Garance Franke-Ruta can attest, the result is frustrated muttering about the product. For various reasons, I think local newspapers remain important to American democracy, and that their waning readership and influence is likely to coincide with more corruption, absent steps to mitigate their decline that aren’t being taken. On the other hand, look at the headlines.

Why are they so oppressively boring?

The banality on display won’t be apparent if your notion of newspaper heds comes from The New York Times. Elite broadsheets turn out some good display copy. But neither is my frustration aimed at obscure newspapers in tiny towns largely unknown to the broader world. Each day, the Newseum updates its Web site with images of the front pages from 800 newspapers worldwide. Perusing them, here are a selection of front page headlines from September 10, 2012.

I defy anyone to get through these without skimming:

  • Bills Wait Congress’ Return (The Atlanta Journal Constitution)
  • Romney Talks Health Fix (The Tampa Bay Times)
  • Day’s Light, Leaves Signalling Noticeable Shift to Autumn (Arizona Daily Star)
  • As Vote Nears, Camps’ Rhetoric Sharpens (The Miami Herald)
  • Price of Maintaining WTC Memorial Is Questioned (The Fresno Bee)

You’re having trouble already, aren’t you?

And these are A1 stories. Here are some more:

  • Homeless Authority Holding Course Through Re-Assessment (Savannah Morning News)
  • For Swing Voters, Tossup For President (The Chicago Tribune)
  • In Nashua, Aldermen Don’t Agree on Panel (New Hampshire Union Leader)
  • Believers Called on to Vote with Faith (The Charlotte Observer)
  • Congress Returns Briefly (Pittsburgh Tribune Review)
  • In Post-9/11 America, Resilience Is Ongoing Project (The Dallas Morning News)
  • Original Marble Counter Reinstalled in Courthouse (The Bloomington Herald-Times)
  • Insurers: Redo Annuity Law That Helps Elderly (Orlando Sentinel)

These are but a small sample of boring headlines from a single day in this country.

The question isn’t whether you’d pay 50 cents to read those stories; it’s whether you’d agree to slog through them if paid $15. Yes, there are reasons why some of these headlines aren’t better. Some of the stories just aren’t very interesting. And ink on paper imposes space constraints.

But the reasons don’t ultimately matter when there are alternatives available. Most newspaper readers formed the habit of buying them before Web headlines,Twitter teases, Facebook likes, and other ways to discover content. What are the chances anyone else would buy a newspaper on the strength of headlines like the ones I listed? I’d put them at approaching zero.

Boring headlines are just one of many problems afflicting newspapers. Still, they seem symptomatic of a broader attitude that makes much of the content contained in their pages needlessly dull. The writers are often capable of writing better copy. The photographers almost always get more interesting images than make it into print. But the prevailing ethos combines a suicidal insistence on staid neutrality with an aversion to anything provocative even within those bounds.

Please, broadsheet editors, free your staffs to be more interesting! A different feel might cost you a few stodgy longtime readers. But let’s be honest, you’re going to lose them to the grave soon anyway.

via Politics : The Atlantic http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/09/an-exasperated-plea-to-newspapers-more-exciting-headlines-please/262188/

IDAHO PLANE THAT CRASHED WAS DROPPING TOILET PAPER ON GOP EVENT…

IDAHO PLANE THAT CRASHED WAS DROPPING TOILET PAPER ON GOP EVENT…

via DrudgeSiren.com – All Stories http://www.drudgesiren.com/allhl.php?id=148505&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+drudgesiren%2FoGpG+%28DrudgeSiren.com+-+All+Stories%29#h148505

Actual Things That Came Out of Human Mouths at Day One of TechCrunch’s Disrupt SF Conference

“Swimming in the social stream.”

“Crowdsourcing app discovery-platform.”

“Can you talk about getting conceptual liftoff?”

“What’s your current go-to-market strategy?”

“Now, let’s talk about disrupting the disruptors.”

“We’re iterating our butts off, dude.”

“Looks like it’s searching for a use case.”

“We’re all about glocal right now.”

“Collaborative consumption is truly a revolution.”

“Plat-Ag.” (As in “Platform-Agnostic.”)

“You did one of the great pivots of all-time.”

“We don’t measure our success by financial results.”

Read more posts by Kevin Roose

Filed Under:
tech conference jargon
,silicon valley
,tech
,techcrunch disrupt
,burn it all down and let’s start over

via Daily Intel http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/09/techcrunch-jargon.html

Apple’s iPhone 5 Seen Selling 10 Million Within Weeks


Apple’s debut of its redesigned iPhone will again test its high-stakes strategy of once-a-year upgrades for a product that accounts for about 70% of the company’s profits.


via Advertising Age – Homepage http://adage.com/article/digital/apple-s-iphone-5-selling-10-million-weeks/237128/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+adage%2Fhomepage+%28Advertising+Age+-+Homepage%29

Ad Overdose

Seth Stevenson subjected himself to 45 hours of Ohio TV advertising, which at this point largely consists of campaign ads:

Something happens when you’ve been exposed to the same short video clip 21 times; your mind untethers, shifting its focus from the script to the symbols. I began to dissect Romney’s body language. Why, I wondered, was this spot so intent on establishing a side-by-side spatial relationship between Mitt and the viewer? Mitt chauffeurs us, gripping the wheel, looking at the road, throwing sidelong glances as he lists his accomplishments. “Aha,” I exclaimed: a classically male, shoulder-to-shoulder, barstool conversational alignment—in tune with Romney’s big advantage among male voters. By contrast, President Obama is usually gazing directly into the camera lens, locking in eye contact as though he and the viewer are on a promising first date.

Relatedly, a reader in Colorado reacts to Romney’s big post-convention ad buy:

As a resident of Denver, I’ve been experiencing the avalanche for many months. It’s worst from 4-6 during local news and national network news, when we routinely get 4, 5, 6 back-to-back ads at every commercial break. One or two will be from Obama, with the rest from Romney and his super-PACs. Like many others here, I jut hit the mute button when they start. I hear friends joke that they now watch everything via DVR, so they can fast-forward through the commercials.

I loathe and fear Citizens United as much as anybody, but I do believe there is a law of diminishing returns with the onslaught of ads.

I lived in California in 2010 when a flood of outside money and money from wealthy candidates blanketed TV for months supporting the Republican statewide candidates, especially Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina. It was as relentless as the Romney avalanche is now. Yet the Democrats won every statewide office, largely, I believe, because the Republican “brand” is so toxic in California.

The Obama campaign has blanketed Colorado with field offices and young, energetic organizers who are busy canvassing, registering voters and getting the word out with friends and neighbors. My only complaint is that they stopped airing a very effective response to the welfare-work lies, and I hope that ad reappears soon. The election will be close, but I’m confident Colorado will stay blue this fall.

via The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/09/ad-overdose.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+andrewsullivan%2FrApM+%28The+Daily+Dish%29