Pfro September 17, 2012 at 10:24AM

@Pfro: Anti-Muslim Filmmaker Nakoula Basseley Nakoula — First PHOTO http://t.co/ZFOCFAQG via @TMZ

DylanByers September 17, 2012 at 08:19AM

@DylanByers: Maureen Dowd meets anti-Semitism charge #ICYMI http://t.co/qWJgd9OP via @POLITICO

chucktodd September 17, 2012 at 07:41AM

@chucktodd: New Romney ad, strikes me as the first ad the campaign should have unveiled after their convention. http://t.co/bSRJtfHO

latimes September 14, 2012 at 12:36PM

@latimes: Most buyers of young adult books are not young adults http://t.co/vuSxt9bt via @latimesbooks

davewiner September 14, 2012 at 11:29AM

@davewiner: Facebook’s Growing Silent-Majority Problem. http://t.co/BgFPQrWU

BreakingNews September 14, 2012 at 08:14AM

@BreakingNews: Protesters break into German embassy building in Sudan, Reuters witness says – @Reuters

GrahamDavidA September 13, 2012 at 01:33PM

@GrahamDavidA: OK, these higher-res versions of new USA Today look better: http://t.co/VlRhSvnb Still, some of those fonts seem to clash #newusatoday

Won’t Debate You Unless You Apologize For Your Socialism

Dumb as presidential elections can get, I am sure readers know it can get a whole lot dumber in House contests, where there are few true “local issues” to liven things up and candidates are mostly running cookie-cutter partisan ads without the inconvenience of much media strutiny (not because reporters aren’t trying, but more because there just ain’t that many of them left outside the very biggest cities).

A good example is one of the most competitive House races in the country, in the 12th district of Georgia, where ever-embattled John Barrow, the last white Democrat in his state’s delegation, is being challenged by Republican state legislator Lee Anderson.

Now I think even Anderson’s closest friends would admit he’s not rhetorically gifted. Complete sentences, particularly those that involve facts and figures, sometimes seem beyond his ken. Indeed, the likelihood that he would get slaughtered in a debate with the incumbent was one of his Republican runoff opponent’s major talking points.

So instead of the usual challenger’s posture of eagerness to debate, Anderson has met Barrrow’s requests with “preconditions,” of the kind Republicans think you need to set when negotiating with the North Koreans or something. Larry Peterson of the Savannah Morning News has the hilarious details:

In politics, it’s usually the challenger who accuses the incumbent of ducking debates.

But in the 12th Congressional District, Democratic Rep. John Barrow says challenger Lee Anderson is shunning them.

Anderson, a Republican state representative from Grovetown, hasn’t refused outright, but wants Barrow to jump through two hoops.

He’ll “consider” a debate if Barrow first discusses on TV his recent tepid endorsement of President Barack Obama.

And, if spokesman Ryan Mahoney adds, Barrow says on camera who he supports for Speaker of the House.

“Barrow,” Mahoney said, “… is incapable of telling the truth to voters … and doesn’t deserve a platform to further promote his empty campaign promises and tired political rhetoric.”

Although saying he’ll answer questions about Obama and his choice for speaker during a debate, Barrow rejects Anderson’s demands.

And now Anderson’s campaign spokesman has issued this non-sequitur:

“Rather than apologize to seniors … for gutting Medicare, entrenched politician John Barrow issued a debate challenge.”

Wonder what’s next? Jim Galloway of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution suggests:

There is talk that Anderson is ready to heap on more requirements intended to even the debating field: Barrow would be required to shave his eyebrows, wear a clown suit with large red pom-pom buttons, and issue all his responses through a nose whistle.

But we have not been able to confirm this.

Sounds about right.

via Political Animal http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_09/wont_debate_you_unless_you_apo039864.php

Romney’s Chief Ally, Ctd

Joe Klein took Netanyahu to task yesterday on Morning Joe, in a few moments that made Bob Wright’s day:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Money quote:

I don’t think I’ve ever, in the 40 years I’ve been doing this, have
heard of another of an American ally trying to push us into war as
blatantly and trying to influence an American election as blatantly as
Bibi Netanyahu and the Likud party in Israel is doing right now. I think
it’s absolutely outrageous and disgusting. It’s not a way that friends
treat each other. And it is cynical and it is brazen. And by the way, a
little bit of history here: In December of 2006, George W. Bush went
over to the Pentagon, met with the joint chiefs of staff and asked them,
“What do you think about military action in Iran?” They were
unanimously opposed to it. And as far as I know, the United States
military, the leaders of the United States military, are unanimously
opposed to it to this day. This is a fool’s errand. It would be a
ridiculous war with absolutely no good coming of it.

Klein elaborates at his blog:

Netanyahu is doing two things that should be intolerable for any patriotic American: he is a foreigner trying to influence our presidential campaign and he is a foreigner trying to shove us into a war of choice in a region where far too many Americans have already died needlessly. The Romney campaign–as well as AIPAC, the AJC and every other American Jewish organization–should make it clear to Netanyahu that his interventions into our political process and policy-making are not welcome here.

Recent Dish on Netanyahu here and here.

via The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/09/he-wants-us-to-do-his-dirty-work.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+andrewsullivan%2FrApM+%28The+Daily+Dish%29

That Time When John Kerry Reached Out to Voters on Friendster

Those were the days.

RTXWCZI-615.jpg

Reuters

The year is 2012, and candidates are all but required to have some sort of “social-media strategy.” The numbers of followers they’ve racked up on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram stand as rough barometers of the campaigns’ health. But just two presidential election cycles ago, Facebook was only available on a handful of campuses and Twitter and Instagram were years away from existing. Online social networking was all quite new.

In those heady days, one candidate, John Kerry, decided early on in the campaign to embrace the social network of the day: Friendster. The other, George W. Bush, took a more conservative approach. As Bloomberg Businessweek reported in March of 2004:

The informally anointed Democratic candidate for President and the North Carolinian who many experts think could wind up as his running mate [John Edwards] recently joined networking Web site Friendster.com, whose visitors create profiles of themselves and connect with various virtual communities of like-minded people. Friendster, whose 5.5 million registrants are 27 years old, on average, is a logical place to find the young voters that former Vermont Governor Howard Dean attracted to his party until his candidacy ended.

The article goes on to describe the candidates’ profiles — Kerry portraying himself as a fun-loving, Hostess-chocolate-cupcake-eating everyman, and Edwards repeating his well-worn autobiography in the About Me section: “I was born 50 years ago and grew up in a tiny mill village named Robbins, N.C. For nearly 20 years I was a lawyer fighting for people like you against big insurance companies and big corporations.”

At least as of the publication of that piece, Bush was yet to create his own Friendster account. Bloomberg Businessweek reported, “President George W. Bush declined an invitation to join. A campaign spokeswoman says Friendster doesn’t fit in with his Internet strategy.” Later on, however, it seems he did finally jump on the social-networking bandwagon — by joining MySpace.

via Technology : The Atlantic http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/09/that-time-when-john-kerry-reached-out-to-voters-on-friendster/262333/