Times-Picayune reporter jumps off the ‘sinking ship’

The Times-Picayune reporter who shared with Romenesko readers the letter she wrote to her bosses in early July (“I can’t just keep my mouth shut and pretend everything is okay or that it doesn’t matter”) has left the paper.

“Today was my last day,” Kari Dequine Harden writes in an email sent late Sunday. “Gonna try to move forward and find something to believe in again. Not that he gives a rat’s ass, but I decided I would let Steve Newhouse know my reasons for an early departure.”

Her letter to the Times-Picayune owner is after the jump.

Dear Mr. Newhouse,

Today is the day I jump off of your sinking ship once known proudly as The Times-Picayune.

I thought I’d be able to go down with it, but I don’t even recognize the ship anymore. Without being held hostage by severance, benefits, or much of a paycheck, I’m drowning for no good reason.

I have no desire to work for bosses who treat their hardworking, dedicated, and irreplaceable employees in the unforgivable manner I have witnessed firsthand over the past three months.

You have betrayed my most esteemed colleagues, my city, my belief in journalism, and my belief in people.

No numbers, statistical trends, academic theories, or self-serving editorials and articles will make me buy the argument that this is the inevitable way of the future. Not here. Not now. Not in this way.

Need I remind you we were profitable? This paper had good years left in it. Great years. Adjustments may have been necessary, I realize, but I will never believe this is all happening because The Times-Picayune could not have survived if you left us alone just as you had done for decades prior.

We would have found a way. And made you a profit the entire time.

Or, there were serious buyers with serious cash who would have taken over. You could have just sold us. But again and again, you refuse. Why? Are you planning on writing us off as a loss? Would that serve your unbridled greed in some sort of inheritance tax scheme? Is our website intentionally horrid?

To have a once respectable, reliable news source taken away so that billionaires can try to squeeze out a few more millions at the expense of a city’s well-being is criminal.

If you do not know what you are taking away, allow me to remind you.

From New Orleans, a city already with odds against, you are taking our historical record. You are taking away a source of news that has been relied upon to document it all–magnificent and mundane–and to hold police and publicly elected officials accountable. This city is worse off for the loss. We will struggle, new sources will emerge and serve the city in positive ways–but do not for a second think that this isn’t a devastating blow to everyone. Competition included.

Some of things we covered were tedious, painful, and marginalized–but important. The present, history, and future of our city are at stake. And in a city facing significant challenges–from ingrained corruption and the highest per-capita murder rate in the country, to environmental armageddon and crumbling infrastructure–we need to read every detail. Every dollar of taxpayer money spent. Every issue. Every day. And to hear it from people who are experienced and have the best interests of the city at heart.

From us, you are not just taking away jobs, you are taking away identities. Purpose. Role in community.

This is not a job that you can leave at the office. We gave up our name, our neck. And we loved our jobs because we believed we genuinely contributed to a more informed, educated, and enlightened society.

From journalism as an industry, you are taking a gem of a newspaper that was respected, read–in print!–and, yes, profitable. Changes may have been in our future, but nothing like this. This paper had soul and heart and traditions and devotion. We were not perfect, and I believe fully in healthy competition, but we were usually decent, often good, and sometimes great. It was a newsroom of an era past, full of characters and quirks and curiosity and gray-haired grouches. There was passion. And humor. Ego, for the most part, was checked at the door.

You have made it abundantly clear that you do not care about quality in journalism. You have made it abundantly clear that you do not care about New Orleans.

But remember that respect from the community–especially ours–is not something you can buy back. (Not that being respected concerns you, as made clear with the single verbal valuation of “noise.”)

You have made it most definitely clear that you do not care about quality journalism in New Orleans. I predict that within two to three years, three days of print will turn into zero days of print and there will be another massive round of back-stabbing layoffs.

I, for one, will not be buying any more newspapers from you. I will not be visiting your atrocious website.

I am eternally grateful for the experience I have gained in my time with your company, but the company I worked for no longer exists.

Signing out,
Kari Dequine
The Times-Picayune

via JIMROMENESKO.COM http://jimromenesko.com/2012/08/13/times-picayune-reporter-jumps-off-the-sinking-ship/

With Reblorg, Tumblr Embraces Its Apocalypse GIF And Bespectacled Panda Penchant

Last January, Fast Company’s Neal Ungerleider described Tumblr’s strategy for 2012 as “More Original Content, Less F*** Yeah Memes.” But who says Tumblr can’t have its cheeseburger gifs and eat them too?

Enter Reblorg, the latest experiment from Tumblr’s six-month old editorial department. Like Storyboard, which Tumblr launched in April, Reblorg curates original content created by the Tumblr community. But where Storyboard included feature reporting on creators and their work, Reblorg’s homepage is a raw sensory assault of head-spinning gifs and image mashups; in other words, the kind of homegrown art Tumblr is perhaps best known for. In a fitting partnership, Tumblr recruited Next Media Animation, the Taiwanese production house famous for its gonzo news recaps, to explain what Reblorg is all about. Standby for bespectacled pandas:

It’s a far cry from most of Storyboard’s content, best exemplified by this tasteful look inside the New York Times’ photo archive. But although Tumblr had grown up a bit, increasing its contributor base to over 60 million blogs and letting go of its long-held reluctance to sell ad space, Reblorg proves the site is still unafraid to embrace the chaos of its community, instead of trying to reign it in.

It should come as little surprise that one of the guys responsible for Reblorg is Christopher “topherchris” Price, who first made his mark on Tumblr not as an employee but as a user (you can read his story here). Price knows the Tumblr community because he came from it, but he also understands the challenges of translating personal social media success to a large media company. And when the community is the source of your site’s content, keeping them happy is crucial.

“I’ve been thinking for a long time about the best way to take the community engagement I do on my personal Tumblr and move it into a larger space,” Price said. “At the same time, we realized that a hub for showing off new creative work from the Tumblr community was a smart thing to try. Combining those two areas is, to me, one of the core values of Tumblr. Creative plus community.”

Users can submit their work by using the #reblorg tag on Tumblr. The editorial team then looks at each submission and posts what its likes. Anything goes, from profane haikus to ice sculptures. But Price admits his own tastes certainly come into play.

“I’m personally fascinated by what I call Internet art–that is, stuff that couldn’t have existed until there was technology to make it and an Internet to put it on–and that’s visible in the content so far. The recent resurgence of the GIF format as an artistic medium, for example, has led to new forms of work that defy description, and a great deal of that experimentation happens on Tumblr.”

Price isn’t alone in his appreciation for animated GIFs. Once the scourge of ’90s web design before being resurrected on message boards and social networks, GIFs are back in a big way. Today, not even the New York Times can escape the hypnotic pull of the GIF, its popularity ushered forth in large part by its use during the London 2012 Olympics. But while the timing couldn’t be better for the kind of art highlighted by Reblorg, Tumblr’s editor-in-chief Chris Mohney emphasizes that the project is about more than driving traffic to Tumblr.com.

“It’s a way to get creative work we like in front of more people, both inside and outside of Tumblr,” Mohney said. “Ideally it becomes a major source of content for accomplished curators and aggregators like Reddit, Buzzfeed, etc. Not to drive eyeballs to Reblorg, but to drive eyeballs to the work itself. Just like with Storyboard, it doesn’t matter to us if someone sees the work we highlight on our sites or on someone else’s. What matters is getting maximum attention for the work, everywhere.”

That may not sound like a recipe for higher revenues, and indeed Mohney emphasizes that, like with Storyboard, Reblorg isn’t looking to feature sponsored content (Tumblr leaves that to its Radar and Spotlight programs). But consider Tumblr’s larger strategy for monetization. In May, Mohney said Tumblr was looking for advertisers to launch creative projects on the site, as opposed to merely buying a few pixels worth of real estate for static ads. If Reblorg can become a destination that people look to for top quality content, and a launchpad that helps creative content go viral, it could be a valuable tool to recruit advertisers who are looking for wider reach and a richer experience than, say, Facebook banner ads have to offer.

When it comes to social networks and search engines, people often say, “You’re not the user, you’re the product.” In a sense, this is no less true for Tumblr than it is for Google or Facebook. But hearing Price and Mohney talk, it’s clear that what their community wants is the same thing they want: more original creative content. Price and Mohney also understand that users don’t care whether that content was made by experts or amateurs. Nor do they care whether they see it on their friend’s Tumblr or CNN’s homepage.

“The mix of curation and creation, premium versus user-generated content … these lines are blurring a lot faster than most people think, especially on the consumer side. Young people especially often don’t distinguish between them, or don’t care about the distinction. Whether or not this is a rich opportunity or a sign of the apocalypse depends on your perspective. Again, I think it’s a little of each. Insert funny apocalypse GIF here.”


via Fast Company http://www.fastcompany.com/3000358/reblorg-tumblr-embraces-its-apocalypse-gif-and-bespectacled-panda-penchant?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+fastcompany%2Fheadlines+%28Fast+Company%29

Bookgirl96 August 13, 2012 at 11:03AM

@Bookgirl96: The Post just hates him. RT @TheAtlanticWire: Crunching the numbers: Anthony Weiner’s new, very expensive life http://t.co/S7Eo6eOn

juliebosman August 13, 2012 at 10:20AM

@juliebosman: A cool scene in Archer City last week, where Larry McMurtry auctioned 300K used books, by @johnwilliamsnyt: http://t.co/mt5JtbNZ

thegarance August 13, 2012 at 08:51AM

@thegarance: QFT RT @moorehn “You don’t even make any money,” Dimon told one group of reporters, mockingly. http://t.co/Bd4IrEj5

amaeryllis August 12, 2012 at 07:23PM

@amaeryllis: Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan match – down to the patterns of their shirts. Seriously? Grow up.

joshgreenman August 12, 2012 at 07:22PM

@joshgreenman: In a Romney-Ryan America, we will all wear checkered shirts.

WSJ August 12, 2012 at 07:22PM

@WSJ: We’re live-blogging the “60 Minutes” Romney-Ryan interview: http://t.co/pvbMKlbJ. Share your analysis with us using #electionwsj.

jopiazza August 12, 2012 at 07:22PM

@jopiazza: Are Mitt and Paul wearing matching shirts on 60 Minutes? #RomneyRyan2012

gettingsome August 12, 2012 at 07:19PM

@gettingsome: .@AndersonCooper’s boyfriend was spotted kissing another man in a New York park. http://t.co/8uN1Fe6l #TeamCoop