{"id":2836,"date":"2013-06-06T07:46:52","date_gmt":"2013-06-06T11:46:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gabrielsnyder.com\/notes\/?p=2836"},"modified":"2013-06-06T07:46:52","modified_gmt":"2013-06-06T11:46:52","slug":"report-says-irs-approved-tax-exempt-status-for-twice-as-many-conservative-groups-as-liberal-groups","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/gabrielsnyder.com\/notes\/2013\/06\/06\/report-says-irs-approved-tax-exempt-status-for-twice-as-many-conservative-groups-as-liberal-groups\/","title":{"rendered":"Report Says IRS Approved Tax-Exempt Status For Twice as Many Conservative Groups as Liberal Groups"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting tidbit from the newsletter <em>Tax Note<\/em>s. As we all know by now, the IRS applies extra scrutiny to a group applying for tax-exempt status if it <img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" align=\"right\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.motherjones.com\/files\/blog_irs_building_0.jpg?w=525\" style=\"border:1px solid black;margin:20px 0px 15px 30px\">suspects the group is political in nature. In 2010, they decided that having &#8220;tea party&#8221; in a group&#8217;s name was sufficient to raise a red flag.<\/p>\n<p>The Inspector General&#8217;s report about this included an audit of 298 groups that had been given special scrutiny. Of these, 96 had &#8220;tea party,&#8221; &#8220;patriots,&#8221; or &#8220;9-12 project&#8221; in their names. But that&#8217;s all we know. We have no idea how many of the 298 groups were liberal and how many were conservative, because the IRS doesn&#8217;t release the name of groups that have applied for tax-exempt status.<\/p>\n<p>However, the IRS does publish the names of groups that have received special scrutiny and been <em>approved<\/em> for tax-exempt status. They recently released a list of 176 organizations that have been approved since 2010, so Martin Sullivan checked each one to figure out if it was liberal or conservative. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxanalysts.com\/www\/features.nsf\/Articles\/D2A6C735EAFA7A9085257B7B004C0D90\">Here&#8217;s what he found:<\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<strong>122<\/strong> conservative<\/li>\n<li>\n<strong>48<\/strong> liberal\/nonconservative<\/li>\n<li>\n<strong>6<\/strong> unknown<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This doesn&#8217;t tell us anything definitive about the entire set of groups that got special scrutiny. If the whole set is similar to the approved set, then about two-thirds were conservative and one-third liberal\u00e2\u20ac\u201dmost likely because of the boom in new tea party groups in 2010. But that&#8217;s just a guess.<\/p>\n<p>One thing <em>isn&#8217;t<\/em> a guess, however: Two-thirds of the groups who were <em>approved<\/em> for tax-exempt status were conservative. If the IRS was on a partisan witch hunt against conservative groups, that&#8217;s sure an odd way of showing it, isn&#8217;t it?<\/p>\n<p>via Kevin Drum Feed | Mother Jones <a href=\"http:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/kevin-drum\/2013\/06\/reports-says-irs-approved-tax-exempt-status-twice-many-conservative-groups-libera\">http:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/kevin-drum\/2013\/06\/reports-says-irs-approved-tax-exempt-status-twice-many-conservative-groups-libera<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting tidbit from the newsletter Tax Notes. As we all know by now, the IRS applies extra scrutiny to a group applying for tax-exempt status if it suspects the group is political in nature. In 2010, they decided that having &#8220;tea party&#8221; in a group&#8217;s name was sufficient to raise a red flag. &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/gabrielsnyder.com\/notes\/2013\/06\/06\/report-says-irs-approved-tax-exempt-status-for-twice-as-many-conservative-groups-as-liberal-groups\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Report Says IRS Approved Tax-Exempt Status For Twice as Many Conservative Groups as Liberal Groups&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[7],"tags":[6,309,310],"class_list":["post-2836","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-google-reader","tag-ifttt","tag-kevin-drum","tag-kevin-drum-feed-mother-jones"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2skW4-JK","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/gabrielsnyder.com\/notes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2836","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/gabrielsnyder.com\/notes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/gabrielsnyder.com\/notes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gabrielsnyder.com\/notes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gabrielsnyder.com\/notes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2836"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/gabrielsnyder.com\/notes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2836\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/gabrielsnyder.com\/notes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2836"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gabrielsnyder.com\/notes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2836"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gabrielsnyder.com\/notes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}